HCI 594 Human-Computer Interaction Capstone

Winter 2008

Instructor

Dr. Craig Miller
Office: 745 CTI Building, 312-362-5085
Email: cmiller@cs.depaul.edu
Web page: http://facweb.cs.depaul.edu/cmiller
Office Hours: Announced on Web page

Course Meeting

Tuesday 5:45-9:00
436a CTI Building
Loop Campus

Readings

Selected readings, mostly from the ACM Digital Library. Access to these articles are free from DePaul computers and from any computer using DePaul proxy servers through the library Web site.

Prerequisites

HCI core courses or instructor permission.

Overview

Students build and reflect upon skills, methods and techniques learned in previous HCI courses. Course meetings generally involve discussing and critiquing ideas and methods from assigned readings. Teams of students will be assigned a week and will be responsible for selecting articles and running the discussion on their assigned week.

The course project involves applying a set of ideas and methods discussed in class and reflecting on their effectiveness. The project may involve the creation of a real application or the implementation of a research study. In either case, the final report must include a reflective component that assesses the methods used for the project. Students may choose their projects with the advice and consent of the instructor.

Goals

Overall, the goal is to learn how to investigate and apply new ideas in human-computer interaction. This includes the following:

Grade Determination

30% (60 points) Summaries of assigned readings (best 6 out of 7)
10% (20 points) Project proposal
10% (20 points) Project milestone 1 (Instructor Reviewed)
10% (20 points) Project milestone 2 (Student Reviewed)
30% (60 points) Project summary
10% (20 points) Class participation

Students receiving more than 90% of possible points are guaranteed at least an A-, more than 80% at least a B-, more than 70% at least a C-, and more than 60% at least a D.

Reading summaries are 1 to 2 page reports that highlight the main ideas of the assigned readings. Students are also expected to discuss the contents of their summaries during class. Turning in a summary without attending class will receive two-thirds the credit. We will discuss what constitutes a good summary on the first day of class. Reading summaries must be prepared before the beginning of class. Late summaries will be accepted for two-thirds credit if turned in by 2pm the following day.

The course project may be done individually or with a team. However, the final report must include individual reflective statements. Late projects will be accepted without penalty until 2pm the day following the due date. Projects turned in later than 2pm the day following the due date will not be accepted.

Course participation includes activities such as proposing readings, leading discussions, presenting work and running exercies.

School policies on instructor evaluation, email, plagiarism and incompletes.

Tentative Schedule

Week Topic Text Reading Project Project Exercises
January 8 Course overview with preliminary readings and discussions Nielsen's article on Usability Metrics and article on Predicting User Satisfaction Discuss project goals  
January 15 Human Factors Ignoring perfect knowledge in-the-world for imperfect knowledge in-the-head, and chapter 4 of The Psychology of Menu Selection Discuss possible projects and requirements  
January 22 User Needs Analysis Posted Readings Project proposal Travis: Portfolio rating, Patryk: Web site requirements
January 29 Information Architecture Posted Readings   Amy: intranet brainstorm, Mike: card swiping experiment
February 5 Interface Design Posted Readings   Wut: card sort, Janie: HE for sorority intranet
February 12 Prototyping and Implementation Prototyping Tool Reports (assigned by group) Milestone 1 Due Kelly: site observations, Jenny: prototyping
February 19 Evaluation Posted Reading   Hsin-Chieh: comparison study
February 26 UCD Methods in Practice Posted Readings Milestone 2 Due Joel: comparison study, Justin: comparison study of site redesign
March 4 Reviews   Peer review of milestone 2 Kris and Kate: evaluate election analysis website
March 11     Project presentations  
March 18     Final project report